Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit Water Hole's column >>

WATER HOLE

Articles Posted: 0  Links Seeded: 176
Member Since: 5/2011  Last Seen: 12/31/2011

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

US plans to snatch & grab Pak's nuclear weapons

Seeded on Sun Aug 7, 2011 1:00 AM EDT
Read ArticleArticle Source: The Economic Times
pakistan, terrorism, nuclear, america, war, world-news, jihad, 9-11, isi, mumbai, nuclear-terrorism, failed-state, pakistan-army, 26-11, mehran
Seeded by Water Hole
Advertise | AdChoices

WASHINGTON: The US has a contingency plan to "snatch-and-grab" Pakistan's nuclear weapons, if and when the President believes they are threat to either America or its interests, a media report has said, amid strains in bilateral ties. 

Plans have been drawn up for dealing with worst-case scenarios in Pakistan, NBC news reported quoting current and former US officials, who say that ensuring security of Pakistan's nuclear weapons has long been a high US security priority even before 9/11 terrorist attacks. 

Among the scenarios drawn by the report is Pakistan plunging into internal chaos, terrorist mounting a serious attack against a nuclear facility, hostilities breaking out with India or Islamic extremist taking charge of the government or the Pakistan army. 

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Published to:

  • Water Hole's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: Anti-War, Counterterrorism, Heated Debate, The War Room
  • Regions: Lithuania , Latvia , Mexico , Netherlands , New Zealand , Japan , Italy , Germany , Greece , Honduras , Iceland , Nicaragua , Panama , Switzerland , Thailand , Ukraine, United Kingdom , Sweden , South Africa , Poland , Romania , Russia , Sing., Finland , Guatemala , Belarus , Canada , Belgium , Austria , El Salvador , Australia , Sri Lanka , Brazil , Costa Rica , Chile , Colombia , Denmark , China , Taiwan , Tokyo, London, Washington DC, Beijing, Rome, Glasgow, Toronto, Chicago, Moscow, San Diego, Los Angeles, San Francisco/Oakland/San Jose, New York, Denver, Honolulu, Columbus/Tupelo/West Point, Wichita/Hutchinson, San Antonio
  • Public Discussion (60)
Water Hole

In the aftermath of the bin Laden raid, US military officials have testified before Congress about the security of Pakistan's nuclear weapons and the threat posed by "loose nukes" - nuclear weapons or materials outside the government's control. And earlier Pentagon reports also outline scenarios in which US forces would intervene to secure nuclear weapons that were in danger of falling into the wrong hands.

  • 2 votes
Reply#1 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 1:01 AM EDT
beaz-435179

This is a very dangerous post.

    #1.1 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 11:39 AM EDT
    Water Hole

    Well, the report isn't dangerous, but if we do not do any thing, the implications will be dangerous.

    We need to send this report to as many people as possible so that they understand the implications and can contribute to finding a solution.

    • 1 vote
    #1.2 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 11:49 AM EDT
    joenathonDeleted
    Radio Free America

    joenathon

    I agree. Why should we heed the articles referred to here that are most likely authored or co-authored by the seeder from their own site/blog and presented as must read news stories. We have been already duped, played by Mr. Chalabi. We need not go down that road again. Why drag our fighting men and women into another country's conflict to the detriment of our peace, prosperity, economy and our soldiers. Let Indians and Pakistanis take care of their own issues. They started it, let them finish it.

    • 2 votes
    #1.4 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 3:01 PM EDT
    joenathonDeleted
    Water Hole

    Words of great wisdom from two frogs in a well.

    After pumping money and weapons into pakistan, and after creating taliban to fight its proxy war with Russia, two great ignorant minds advise India to resolve issue with pakistan.

    RFA and joe......, your world is probably limited to your bedroom. And your consciousness does not reach beyond what you can borrow next and from whom.

    Read geography from your kids books and read about the world, beyond your bedroom, on the internet.

    India has never asked USA for any thing. India knows that USA will betray, like it always has, during Indo-pak wars.

    With people like you, no wonder USA is going down the drain.

    • 2 votes
    #1.6 - Mon Aug 8, 2011 11:54 AM EDT
    Reply
    Water Hole

    US, Pak heading towards confrontation over FMCT

    The US and Pakistan are heading towards a confrontation as the Obama administration is preparing to pursue Islamabad to halt the production of nuclear bomb materials by forcing it to sign the Fissile Material Cut off Treaty (FMCT), a media report said on Friday. US plans to launch an open

    move with support from other powers to force Pakistan to sign the treaty and halt the production of nuclear bombs material.

    Recent reports in the US media suggest that the UN General Assembly in New York next month will be the venue for this new push, a move that could aggravate tensions with Pakistan.

    • 1 vote
    Reply#2 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 1:02 AM EDT
    Water Hole

    The US and its allies are seeking an agreement by September and then go to the UN General Assembly with a joint plan for starting talks on the FMCT.

    So far Pakistan has successfully resisted all international pressure to endorse the FMCT, warning that it would boycott any process to negotiate a US-backed treaty outside the deadlocked UN Conference on Disarmament (UNCD).

    The Geneva-based UNCD is the sole negotiating forum for multilateral disarmament but the treaty has been stalled in the conference for 12 years, with Pakistan as the sole holdout against negotiations.

    The US move aims at creating a new forum where it can persuade Pakistan to sign the FMCT.

    • 1 vote
    Reply#3 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 1:03 AM EDT
    Water Hole

    Pakistan's acting representative to the UN, Raza Bashir Tarar, last week told a General Assembly meeting in New York that his country "will not join any such process nor would it consider accession to the outcome of any such process."

    To deal with increasing international pressure to stop the production of fissile material, Pakistan tried unsuccessfully to enter into a nuclear agreement with the US similar to the one Washington has signed with India.

    • 1 vote
    Reply#4 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 1:04 AM EDT
    Water Hole

    U.S. Opposes Moving Nuclear Material Talks Out of Geneva: Senior Official

    WASHINGTON -- The Obama administration now strongly opposes efforts to move negotiations on a proposed fissile material cutoff treaty out of the international Conference on Disarmament, where the matter has been stalled for two years, according to a senior U.S. official (see GSN, Aug. 1).

    The development follows initial indications that Washington might be open to finding a new venue for formal FMCT talks.

    Under such an accord, nations would pledge not to produce new weapon-grade uranium or plutonium, but could continue to generate fissile material for nonmilitary energy needs. The matter has been on the United Nations' agenda for more than five decades.

    The international body convened a high-level meeting last week in New York to discuss ways to break the longstanding deadlock in Geneva (see GSN, July 28).

    Pakistan has blocked talks on a fissile materials agreement on the basis that neighboring rival India has been given what Islamabad sees as an unfair leg up in its ability to bolster its atomic stockpile, even after a ban on producing new fissile material is implemented. Islamabad in 2009 accepted a CD work plan that included fissile material negotiations, but changed its position soon thereafter.

    • 1 vote
    Reply#5 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 1:07 AM EDT
    Water Hole

    In 1978, India (also USA and Britain) knew Pak is planning nuclear tests

    PTI Jul 28, 2011, 12.40pm IST

    WASHINGTON: Though the US and the UK did not inform India of a covert operation to stop Pakistan going nuclear, New Delhi had its own intelligence in 1978 to conclude that Islamabad was just two or three years away from making an atomic bomb, according to declassified documents.

    Both the US and Britain collectively decided not to inform India about the operation, fearing it would have adverse impact in Pakistan if was leaked from New Delhi.

    "Having heard reports that an evolving plan to curb the Pakistani nuclear programme might involve informing the Indian government about US concerns, (US) Ambassador (to Pakistan, Arthur) Hummel suggested that going through with that, especially providing factual information, would have an adverse impact in Pakistan if word of it leaked from New Delhi," said the US Embassy cable issued from New Delhi on November 17, 1978.

    • 1 vote
    Reply#6 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 1:12 AM EDT
    joenathonDeleted
    Reply
    WatcherInTheShadows

    Oh I am sure India is loving this turn of events.

    • 1 vote
    Reply#7 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 1:31 AM EDT
    Water Hole

    It is not for India alone.

    It is for Europe and America. Pakistanis have already promised America Jihad for killing bin Laden and they will use nuclear bomb as part of jihad.

    US and British complicity in letting pakistan achieve this state of nuclear of fissile material production, is mentioned in

    #6 and other articles linked on my column.

    • 1 vote
    #7.1 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 1:49 AM EDT
    WatcherInTheShadows

    That was merely a comment on the continuing state of tension between India and Pakistan. They are at each other's throats like the US and Russia was at one point.

    • 1 vote
    #7.2 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 2:02 AM EDT
    Radio Free America

    Wraith777

    I agree. This way India will do the dirty work and then they can take away their weapons. Here

    Here we go with another "someone to hate" so the warring and security industries can continue to rob the American people and tote it is socialist programs that are ruining the economy.

    • 1 vote
    #7.3 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 2:34 AM EDT
    Water Hole

    India is concerned about pakistani terrorism in India, and has been trying to stop it, that too peacefully, by talking to pakistan; though no body knows who to talk to in pakistan : Army? Elected Government? President? Taliban? Al Qaeda? USA? Freedom fighters of Gilgit, Baltistan, Balochistan, Sindh, Muhajjirs?

    And, India has never been an aggressor as aptly brought out by the history of conflict between India and pakistan, and very explicitly brought out in Pakistan : Myths versus realities (of the aggressive Military)

    India is interested in peace, economic growth and prosperity; not conflict. AND wants to save itself from any aggression, explicit or disguised (like terrorism, the state policy of pakistan).

    • 1 vote
    #7.4 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 2:41 AM EDT
    WatcherInTheShadows

    @Water Hole:

    Uh, that wasn't a condemnation of India either.

      #7.5 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 2:53 AM EDT
      Radio Free America

      I am sick of pre-preemptive war propaganda. This is another WMD bogus story. If I hear the word terrorist one more time... It was an on hold term waiting a chance for us. Americans tired of the communist scare so they needed a new word. If they do not let us have our way let's bomb them. I think that makes us the WWII Germany, the world's latest bully. While other countries are carrying for their countries, we are neglecting our country and bombing the rest of the world. Save it. I am not buying it no matter how many helicopters follow me. I will keep my anti-war stance.

      • 1 vote
      #7.6 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 2:54 AM EDT
      WatcherInTheShadows

      @Radio Free America:

      It's all well and good to be about peace and love. But if your neighbor isn't feeling it. You got problems and probly a early grave in the works. There are people out there that want us dead. Maybe not as many as we are led to believe. But there are people out there.

        #7.7 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 2:57 AM EDT
        Radio Free America

        Pakistan is not thinking about warring with us. That they are is our paranoid narcissistic false sense of superiority talking. As the slave master thought they were so important to the slaves that the slaves wanted to kill them. That is a mental condition where one projects their own thoughts on to others as the thoughts of others. The slave could have cared less. They just wanted to be free of the slave masters and to have the slave masters out of their lives. So it is with the rest of the world in regards to our colonial endeavors. Yet we continue to be the unwelcome guess that also over stays.

        The lack of peace and love is internal and not with our neighbors.

        • 1 vote
        #7.8 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 3:06 AM EDT
        Water Hole

        Wraith777

        Uh, that wasn't a condemnation of India either.

        I understand.

        The comments were for bringing out the facts about India's efforts on peace with pakistan, a failed state as exemplified by BXURZ in #8.

        Its very difficult to live with a failing neighbor, and India (and Afghanistan) is bearing most of the brunt.

        • 1 vote
        #7.9 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 3:06 AM EDT
        WatcherInTheShadows

        @Radio Free America:

        Paraphrasing Londo Mollari *Babylon 5*

        "On the issue of international peace, I am long past innocence and fast approaching apathy. It's all a game -- a paper fantasy of names and borders. Only one thing matters, RFA. Blood calls out for blood."

          #7.10 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 3:27 AM EDT
          Radio Free America

          Only one thing matters, RFA. Blood calls out for blood."

          Too barbaric for me. Too archaic.

          • 1 vote
          #7.11 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 3:47 AM EDT
          WatcherInTheShadows

          @Radio Free America:

          It's a simple fact. We are still very much animals.

          • 1 vote
          #7.12 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 3:54 AM EDT
          Radio Free America

          Agreed Wraith777. Yet I think the animals are often more civil.

          • 2 votes
          #7.13 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 3:58 AM EDT
          Reply
          BXURZ

          Pakistan: Failed State by 2015

          http://bxurz.newsvine.com/_news/2011/05/10/6619999-pakistan-failed-state-by-2015

          • 1 vote
          Reply#8 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 2:15 AM EDT
          WatcherInTheShadows

          @Radio Free America:

          They knowingly shelter Osama Bin Laden RFA. That pretty well shows how they stand. But, they also played us for continuing monetary support. With that support now withdrawn with knowledge of their duplicity they will obviously seek other ways for monetary support. Their nuclear arsenal being an obvious asset should they start selling to those that would give alot to get it.

          If you applied the same amount of skepticism you applied towards the American Government to everyone. You'd see it's hardly as cut and dry as you imagine. I agree we had no place in Iraq but not every place is Iraq.

          • 2 votes
          Reply#9 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 3:18 AM EDT
          Radio Free America

          They knowingly shelter Osama Bin Laden RFA.

          He was hiding in Pakistan. I have seen no proof that Pakistan was housing him. We knew since mid 2010 where he was so if we continued to supply Pakistan with money, we were not being played. I apply skepticism where it is warranted and evidenced necessary by past behavior. I know nothing of the inter-workings of Pakistan. I do know the inter-workings of... Its history is of a cold warring non-peaceful culture. Now we know why the debt ceiling was raised and social programs were cut. So there would be money to continue warring. Ask Germany what continued warring did for them, WWI and WWII. American leaders need to take some anger management sessions.

          • 2 votes
          #9.1 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 3:44 AM EDT
          WatcherInTheShadows

          @Radio Free America:

          It's rather naive, given his location, to believe they didn't have a clue.

          Now we know why the debt ceiling was raised and social programs were cut. So there would be money to continue warring.

          Uh. No. The issue is far more complex than that.

            #9.2 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 4:19 AM EDT
            Reply
            Water Hole

            I am actually amazed at the self criticism and ensuing negativism of western world (specially Americans) about their own society, culture and country.

            In very many discussion threads, I have found that the Americans and Britons start criticising their culture and country when it comes to discussions about islam. They try and show that a small insignificant incident compares with hundreds of years of bloodbath of islam, or how their own culture is inferior since it tries to prevent islamisation.

            This is an extremely dangerous trend.

            These apologists are causing great amount of damage to their own country, in which they live, enjoy their life and express their views freely, AND which will not be possible if they were to follow islamic laws. They also do not realise (probably not capable of realising) that the muslims are encroaching on their lands, cultures and countries because sharia does not permit them to prosper AND that these muslims are misusing the liberty / freedom offered by western world.

            • 2 votes
            Reply#10 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 4:02 AM EDT
            Radio Free America

            I am actually amazed at the self criticism and ensuing negativism of western world (specially Americans) about their own society, culture and country.

            "To thy own-self be true" This is especially in regarding the truth about oneself. Self criticism as you say, self evaluation as I say should be first before criticising someone else including Pakistan. It is a Constitutional right and a patriotic duty to assess those who are charge with the running of our country. I would do this for anyone that is working for me including civil employees/workers. Not to do so is a misuse of freedom.

            • 1 vote
            #10.1 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 4:20 AM EDT
            WatcherInTheShadows

            Oh. I'll be the first to criticisize my government. But I don't think an anti-government bias is a good thing either.

              #10.2 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 4:30 AM EDT
              Radio Free America

              But I don't think an anti-government bias is a good thing either.

              Agreed. Yet it is our responsibility to know what those running our government are doing. Those running our government and our government are not the same. I am very proud of the government we have created. I do not confuse our government with those elected to run it. Those elected to run our government should respect and adhere to its rules and reasons why.

              • 1 vote
              #10.3 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 4:40 AM EDT
              Water Hole

              Too much, and out of context, is too bad.

              • 2 votes
              #10.4 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 4:52 AM EDT
              Radio Free America

              No it is not. I am replying to Wraith777 not you. You have suggested that Americans should not speak against their government and you are not even an American and obviously do not know or comprehend our way of life including our governance.

                #10.5 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 4:55 AM EDT
                Water Hole

                I do not need to understand your way of life.

                I am only bothered about not getting killed by pakistani terrorists who have been funded and armed by US through aid provided to pakistan, despite all evidences proving this.

                And, I am also bothered about the nuclear arsenal built across the border by using US aid.

                And, I am also bothered about the fact that USA supported pakistan in numerous wars with India, providing aid and military support to pakistan for the genocide in Kashmir and Bangladesh.

                And, I am bothered about the fact that USA will continue to support pakistan despite all evidences that pakistan is a rogue state.

                I am bothered about USA's actions hurting India.

                Are you bothered? Have you criticised your government? NO.

                • 2 votes
                #10.6 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 5:04 AM EDT
                Reply
                Water Hole

                Also read

                Nuclear Security in Pakistan: Reducing the Risks of Nuclear Terrorism :

                Today's frightening instability in Pakistan comes in a world in which global terrorists are actively seeking nuclear weapons and the materials and expertise needed to make them, a quest that has been underway for more than a decade. Rapid action is needed to keep the Taliban's advances in Pakistan from creating new opportunities for these deadly adversaries.

                • 1 vote
                Reply#11 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 4:21 AM EDT
                Radio Free America

                There is an old saying. "Put it in black and white and they will believe it." This refers to printed text. What is your country?

                • 1 vote
                #11.1 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 4:28 AM EDT
                Water Hole

                Radio Free America
                There is an old saying. "Put it in black and white and they will believe it." This refers to printed text. What is your country?

                India.

                  #11.2 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 4:50 AM EDT
                  Reply
                  Radio Free America

                  I do not need to understand your way of life.

                  Then how can you intelligently speak on whether or not we should take Pakistanis weapons? How can you speak on and criticize our citizens and how we address our government? It is very obvious by your comments you do not understand our way of life and therefore should not nor are qualified to decide our foreign policy. Mr Ahmed Chalabi

                  • 1 vote
                  Reply#12 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 5:10 AM EDT
                  Water Hole

                  Mr Ahmed Chalabi

                  Whats this?

                  RFA, Lets discuthe contents of the article, instead of discussing inane stuff.

                  Read

                  #10.6

                  • 1 vote
                  Reply#13 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 5:32 AM EDT
                  Radio Free America

                  Insane to you. The stuff in the article is insane and I agree with those who say it is a dangerous post. You are not the newsvine police of discussion and opinion. Learn to tolerate disagreement. That is the American way.

                  • 1 vote
                  #13.1 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 12:10 PM EDT
                  Water Hole

                  Insane to you. The stuff in the article is insane and I agree with those who say it is a dangerous post. You are not the newsvine police of discussion and opinion. Learn to tolerate disagreement. That is the American way.

                  RFC, you still have no answer to 10.6, do you? So you have tried to divert the attention elsewhere.

                  Please lets discuss the contents of the thread and lets not get entagled with your ego and your way of life.

                  BTW, ask the Red Indians about American way of life.

                  • 1 vote
                  #13.2 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 12:17 PM EDT
                  Radio Free America

                  You have not answered the question as to your country. Obviously it is India which explains your bias aganst Pakistan and anger at my responses. I do not have any bias against either country therefore see more clearly. If you really understood my country and those who run it, you would not be so angry at Pakistan. I am a minority in this country and see that other non-westerns in this world have a lot to learn.

                  • 2 votes
                  #13.3 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 1:12 PM EDT
                  WatcherInTheShadows

                  @Radio Free America:

                  Learn to tolerate disagreement. That is the American way.

                  The American way largely abandoned then. Look at Washington, hell look at this website alone. People here are finding it harder and harder to tolerate differences of any kind in the United States. I'm worried it will continue, as it shows every sign of doing. Until we reach critical mass and it tears us apart.

                  You have not answered the question as to your country.

                  Yes he did. #11.2

                  • 1 vote
                  #13.4 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 6:59 PM EDT
                  Radio Free America

                  Thanks Wraith777. I did not see his response.

                  It is the American way whether we are following it or not. There are those of us who still believe in the ideas that created our country. I also note them on this site not just those who are intolerant. I also speak to those who are intolerant. It is alright to disagree. It is helpful to disagree and learn what others think. At least for me it promotes thought. Washington is a small fraction of America. It does not represent what all Americans think. There are some in Washington that would like to control our thoughts. It is up to us not to let that happen.

                  • 1 vote
                  #13.5 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 7:09 PM EDT
                  WatcherInTheShadows

                  @Radio Free America:

                  To quote the song: "Everybody wants to rule the world.". It's really just a question of 1) who has everyone's best interests at heart and 2) who is too inept to actually do it.

                  • 2 votes
                  #13.6 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 7:13 PM EDT
                  Reply
                  sceptical-2486196

                  Water Hole - What if the US stops supporting Pakistan and just leaves them alone. Then the Chinese might help them. You don't want that do you?

                  • 2 votes
                  Reply#14 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 6:28 AM EDT
                  Water Hole

                  Chinese will 'use' pakistan, because they need access to arabian sea.

                  But the Chinese will use pakistan, because they know that pakistan means terrorism, and chinese have tasted it. China Points to Pakistan in Xinjiang Attack - WSJ.com

                  Situation is complicated, but, pakistan's jihadi culture needs to be dismantled step by step, starting with nukes, and then dividing pakistan into its component nations. The Balochis, Sindhis, Baltistanis and others are waiting for their freedom from ruling elites of pakistan, which are Punjabis.

                  • 1 vote
                  #14.1 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 7:01 AM EDT
                  Reply
                  Water Hole

                  Is Pakistan a Nuclear Target of the United States, and Might America Become a Pakistani Nuclear Target?

                  • 1 vote
                  Reply#15 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 6:37 AM EDT
                  curtonthebeach

                  The US has a contingency plan to "snatch-and-grab" Pakistan's nuclear weapons,

                  Let's hope they get all of them if and when they decide to try, all it takes is that they miss one single "nuke".

                  • 4 votes
                  Reply#16 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 9:27 AM EDT
                  Water Hole

                  Court Papers Suggest Pakistani Interest in Thermonuclear Weapon

                  Tuesday, July 19, 2011

                  The United States in federal court documents offered its first open suggestion that nuclear-armed Pakistan could be seeking to build a thermonuclear weapon, the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review reported on Sunday (see GSN, July 7).

                  The Justice Department has charged a Chinese woman living in the United States with illegally exporting high-tech paint coatings that could aid Pakistan's nuclear weapons development. As the ex-managing director of a Chinese branch of PPG Industries, Xun Wang is accused of shipping the material five years ago in direct disobedience of the Pittsburgh-based company and nonproliferation guidelines issued by the U.S. Commerce Department.

                  Pakistan holds nuclear arms outside the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and is a known past proliferator of sensitive technology and information through the black market operation once led by scientist Abdul Qadeer Khan. As such, the United States has placed a number of restrictions on the trade of sensitive goods with the South Asian nation.

                  • 1 vote
                  Reply#17 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 1:53 PM EDT
                  Water Hole

                  Khan: Pakistan sold nuclear weapons technology to North Korea

                  The creator of the Pakistani nuclear weapons program has handed over documents that he says show senior military officials were paid millions to give nuclear weapons technology to North Korea, putting further strain on a tense US-Pakistan relationship.

                  Abdul Qadeer Khan, an American-trained scientist and head of the Pakistani nuclear weapons program for over 20 years, says that two senior Pakistani military officials kickbacks from North Korea in exchange for the technology

                  Khan gave documents to Simon Henderson of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, who is seen as an expert on Pakistan's nuclear weapons program.

                  • 1 vote
                  Reply#18 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 1:56 PM EDT
                  Water Hole

                  SCARY facts about Pakistan's nuclear stockpile

                  Last updated on: July 8, 2011 09:52 IST

                  Pakistan has the world's fastest-growing nuclear stockpile and it could achieve 150-200 warheads in a decade despite the political instability in the country, two top American atomic experts have said.

                  Pakistan is in the process of building two new plutonium production reactors and a new reprocessing facility to fabricate more nuclear weapons fuel, wrote nuclear experts Hans M Kristensen and Robert S Norris in the latest issue of Bulletin of Atomic Scientists.

                  In their paper Pakistan's nuclear forces, 2011, the authors estimate that if Pakistan's expansion continues, its nuclear weapons stockpile could reach 150-200.

                  "Despite its political instability, Pakistan continues to steadily expand its nuclear capabilities and competencies; in fact, it has the world's fastest-growing nuclear stockpile," they wrote.

                  • 1 vote
                  Reply#19 - Sun Aug 7, 2011 1:59 PM EDT
                  ivorybill

                  People are going to continue hating each other, I forsee. The "Armageddon" of it all is not of any nations to resolve. Atheist can not solve it, christians can not solve it, no mam/woman was ever meant to solve it.

                  • 1 vote
                  Reply#20 - Sun Aug 14, 2011 12:55 PM EDT
                  Mary-3946555

                  So the U.S. believes that smash and grab is an appropriate way to handle dangerous nuclear weapons? Wow Obama boy is even dumber than I thought.

                    Reply#21 - Sat Aug 20, 2011 10:41 PM EDT
                    WatcherInTheShadows

                    Oh so you'd rather a crumbling and unpredictable regime have weapons capable of destruction on a massive scale continue to have them? How nice.

                    • 2 votes
                    #21.1 - Sat Oct 1, 2011 7:35 PM EDT
                    Reply
                    yaya-3626794

                    It's pretty crazy that this article is attended for Euro news and not even attended for American news.

                      Reply#22 - Fri Sep 30, 2011 3:32 AM EDT
                      Leave a Comment:
                      You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                      You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
                      (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
                      Newsvine Privacy Statement
                      As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                      FUN STUFF:
                      • Leaderboard |
                      • E-Mail Alerts |
                      • Top of the Vine |
                      • Newsvine Live |
                      • Newsvine Archives |
                      • The Greenhouse |
                      COMPANY STUFF:
                      • Code of Honor |
                      • Company Info |
                      • Contact Us |
                      • Jobs |
                      • User Agreement |
                      • Privacy Policy |
                      • About our ads
                      LEGAL STUFF:
                      • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
                      • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
                      • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com